El Salvador vs Kiribati: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
El Salvador
94.0%
in 2022
Kiribati
93.0%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
39th
Kiribati rank
40th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- El Salvador
- Kiribati
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 94.0% against 93.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 39th and Kiribati ranks 40th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.6% | 54.0% | 35.6% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 87.6% | 2.4% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 92.7% | 93.0% | 0.3% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), El Salvador or Kiribati?
- El Salvador, at 94.0% against 93.0% in Kiribati as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between El Salvador and Kiribati?
- 1.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do El Salvador and Kiribati rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- El Salvador ranks 39th and Kiribati ranks 40th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.