Congo vs Timor-Leste: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Congo
87.0%
in 2022
Timor-Leste
85.0%
in 2022
Congo rank
67th
Timor-Leste rank
70th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Congo
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Congo currently reports 87.0% against 85.0% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 2.0%.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 67th and Timor-Leste ranks 70th of 105 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.0% | 63.1% | 14.9% | Congo |
| 2010s | 84.2% | 81.6% | 2.6% | Congo |
| 2020s | 87.0% | 84.3% | 2.7% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Congo or Timor-Leste?
- Congo, at 87.0% against 85.0% in Timor-Leste as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Congo and Timor-Leste?
- 2.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Timor-Leste?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Timor-Leste rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Congo ranks 67th and Timor-Leste ranks 70th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.