Botswana vs Malawi: Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Botswana
91.0%
in 2022
Malawi
90.0%
in 2022
Botswana rank
51st
Malawi rank
54th
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Botswana
- Malawi
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 91.0% against 90.0% in Malawi, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Botswana ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 54th of 105 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.6% | 86.3% | 2.7% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 92.1% | 88.7% | 3.4% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 91.0% | 90.0% | 1.0% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Botswana or Malawi?
- Botswana, at 91.0% against 90.0% in Malawi as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Botswana and Malawi?
- 1.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Malawi?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Botswana and Malawi rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Botswana ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 54th of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.