Bahamas vs High income (World Bank): Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB)
Bahamas
100.0%
in 2022
High income (World Bank)
99.0%
in 2022
Bahamas rank
1st
High income (World Bank) rank
1st
Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) over time
- Bahamas
- High income (World Bank)
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 100.0% against 99.0% in High income (World Bank), a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was High income (World Bank) ahead.
Bahamas ranks 1st and High income (World Bank) ranks 1st of 105 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | High income (World Bank) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.1% | 87.7% | 4.4% | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 99.5% | 96.4% | 3.1% | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 99.0% | 1.0% | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab), Bahamas or High income (World Bank)?
- Bahamas, at 100.0% against 99.0% in High income (World Bank) as of 2022.
- What is the difference in neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab) between Bahamas and High income (World Bank)?
- 1.0%, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and High income (World Bank)?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Bahamas and High income (World Bank) rank globally for neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (pab)?
- Bahamas ranks 1st and High income (World Bank) ranks 1st of 105 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.