How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and East Timor?

21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sri Lanka vs East Timor: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre

Sri Lanka

0 units per square kilometre

in 2023

East Timor

0 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Sri Lanka rank

67th

East Timor rank

67th

Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre over time

Sri Lanka
East Timor

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 67th and East Timor ranks 67th of 204 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sri Lanka	East Timor	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	0.0002 units per square kilometre	East Timor
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	East Timor
2020s	0 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	0.0001 units per square kilometre	East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre, Sri Lanka or East Timor?: Sri Lanka, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre between Sri Lanka and East Timor?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and East Timor?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and East Timor rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre?: Sri Lanka ranks 67th and East Timor ranks 67th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs East Timor: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/neonatal-tetanus-number-of-reported-cases-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/neonatal-tetanus-number-of-reported-cases-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/timor-leste/">Sri Lanka vs East Timor: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 205 places, 7,318 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed: 10 September 2026

Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.