Singapore vs Zimbabwe: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre

Singapore
0 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Zimbabwe
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
67th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre over time

  • Singapore
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.0060.008197419982023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0007 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.0012 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0007 units per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre, Singapore or Zimbabwe?
Singapore, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2018.
What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre between Singapore and Zimbabwe?
0 units per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2018.
How do Singapore and Zimbabwe rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre?
Singapore ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Zimbabwe: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/neonatal-tetanus-number-of-reported-cases-per-square-kilometre/singapore/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/neonatal-tetanus-number-of-reported-cases-per-square-kilometre/singapore/zimbabwe/">Singapore vs Zimbabwe: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 7,318 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.