Guam vs Sri Lanka: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre

Guam
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
67th
Sri Lanka rank
67th

Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • Sri Lanka
00.0050.010.015197419982023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Guam ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0116 units per square kilometre 0.0116 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0.0018 units per square kilometre 0.0018 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Guam
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre, Guam or Sri Lanka?
Guam, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre between Guam and Sri Lanka?
0 units per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Sri Lanka?
43 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Guam and Sri Lanka rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Sri Lanka: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/neonatal-tetanus-number-of-reported-cases-per-square-kilometre/guam/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/neonatal-tetanus-number-of-reported-cases-per-square-kilometre/guam/sri-lanka/">Guam vs Sri Lanka: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 7,318 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.