Macao vs Spain: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita
Macao
0 units per person
in 2025
Spain
0 units per person
in 2025
Macao rank
65th
Spain rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita over time
- Macao
- Spain
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Spain, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 65th and Spain ranks 65th of 204 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Macao |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita, Macao or Spain?
- Macao, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Spain as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita between Macao and Spain?
- 0 units per person, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Spain?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Macao and Spain rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita?
- Macao ranks 65th and Spain ranks 65th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.