Brazil vs China: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita
Brazil
0 units per person
in 2025
China
0 units per person
in 2025
Brazil rank
65th
China rank
64th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita over time
- Brazil
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 units per person.
Across all 28 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 65th and China ranks 64th of 204 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | China |
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | China |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | China |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita, Brazil or China?
- China, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita between Brazil and China?
- 0 units per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and China rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 65th and China ranks 64th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.