Sri Lanka vs East Timor: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Sri Lanka
0
in 2025
East Timor
0
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
65th
East Timor rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Sri Lanka
- East Timor
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 against 0 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 65th and East Timor ranks 65th of 210 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.875 | 2.75 | 1.88 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0 | 1.08 | 1.08 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Sri Lanka or East Timor?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 against 0 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Sri Lanka and East Timor?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and East Timor?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and East Timor rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Sri Lanka ranks 65th and East Timor ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.