South Africa vs Sri Lanka: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
South Africa
0
in 2025
Sri Lanka
0
in 2025
South Africa rank
65th
Sri Lanka rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- South Africa
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0 against 0 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
South Africa ranks 65th and Sri Lanka ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 165.67 | 730.17 | 564.5 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 139.2 | 114.3 | 24.9 | South Africa |
| 1990s | 20.1 | 8.3 | 11.8 | South Africa |
| 2000s | 6.3 | 1.1 | 5.2 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 1.83 | 0 | 1.83 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, South Africa or Sri Lanka?
- South Africa, at 0 against 0 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between South Africa and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sri Lanka?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2025.
- How do South Africa and Sri Lanka rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- South Africa ranks 65th and Sri Lanka ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.