Serbia vs Uruguay: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Serbia
0
in 2025
Uruguay
0
in 2025
Serbia rank
65th
Uruguay rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 against 0 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 46.17 | 1.5 | 44.67 | Serbia |
| 1980s | 9.6 | 0.2 | 9.4 | Serbia |
| 1990s | 2.45 | 0 | 2.45 | Serbia |
| 2000s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Serbia, at 0 against 0 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 0, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2025.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Serbia ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.