Romania vs Serbia: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Romania
0
in 2025
Serbia
0
in 2025
Romania rank
65th
Serbia rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Romania
- Serbia
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0 against 0 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Serbia ahead.
Romania ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.8333 | 4.67 | 3.83 | Serbia |
| 1990s | 0.8 | 2.45 | 1.65 | Serbia |
| 2000s | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Romania or Serbia?
- Romania, at 0 against 0 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Romania and Serbia?
- 0, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Serbia?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2025.
- How do Romania and Serbia rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Romania ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.