Namibia vs Rwanda: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Namibia
1
in 2024
Rwanda
1
in 2025
Namibia rank
55th
Rwanda rank
55th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Namibia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1 against 1 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 55th of 210 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25.62 | 1.38 | 24.25 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 8.4 | 5.2 | 3.2 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2.6 | 0.7 | 1.9 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Namibia or Rwanda?
- Namibia, at 1 against 1 in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Namibia and Rwanda?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Namibia ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 55th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.