Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Malawi
2
in 2025
Zimbabwe
2
in 2025
Malawi rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
46th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 2 against 2 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 210 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 291.6 | 173.2 | 118.4 | Malawi |
| 1990s | 51.55 | 15.7 | 35.85 | Malawi |
| 2000s | 8.3 | 6.5 | 1.8 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 3.9 | 2.5 | 1.4 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 3.83 | 0.8333 | 3 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Malawi, at 2 against 2 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Malawi ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.