Macau, China vs Serbia: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Macau, China
0
in 2025
Serbia
0
in 2025
Macau, China rank
65th
Serbia rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Macau, China
- Serbia
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 0 against 0 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
Across all 38 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Macau, China ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Serbia |
| 1990s | 0.1 | 2.45 | 2.35 | Serbia |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Macau, China or Serbia?
- Macau, China, at 0 against 0 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Macau, China and Serbia?
- 0, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Serbia?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
- How do Macau, China and Serbia rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Macau, China ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.