Kiribati vs Uruguay: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Kiribati
0
in 2025
Uruguay
0
in 2025
Kiribati rank
65th
Uruguay rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Kiribati
- Uruguay
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 against 0 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kiribati ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1.3 | 0 | 1.3 | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Kiribati or Uruguay?
- Kiribati, at 0 against 0 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Kiribati and Uruguay?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Uruguay?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Uruguay rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Kiribati ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.