Guam vs Serbia: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Guam
0
in 2023
Serbia
0
in 2025
Guam rank
65th
Serbia rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Guam
- Serbia
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0 against 0 in Serbia, a difference of 0.
Across all 50 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 | 46.17 | 46.17 | Serbia |
| 1980s | 0 | 9.6 | 9.6 | Serbia |
| 1990s | 0.1 | 2.45 | 2.35 | Serbia |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Guam or Serbia?
- Guam, at 0 against 0 in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Guam and Serbia?
- 0, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Serbia?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
- How do Guam and Serbia rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Guam ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.