Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Eswatini
0
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
0
in 2021
Eswatini rank
65th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Eswatini
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 against 0 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 65th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 48 | 3.62 | 44.38 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Eswatini, at 0 against 0 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2021.
- How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Eswatini ranks 65th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.