Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Ecuador
0
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
0
in 2021
Ecuador rank
65th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Ecuador
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 against 0 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 65th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 76.56 | 3.22 | 73.33 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 52.8 | 1.2 | 51.6 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 6.1 | 0 | 6.1 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.25 | 0 | 0.25 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Ecuador or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Ecuador, at 0 against 0 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Ecuador ranks 65th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.