Côte d'Ivoire vs Myanmar: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Côte d'Ivoire
12
in 2025
Myanmar
7
in 2025
Côte d'Ivoire rank
32nd
Myanmar rank
35th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Myanmar
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 12 against 7 in Myanmar, a difference of 5.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.7 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 32nd and Myanmar ranks 35th of 210 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Myanmar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 516.75 | 62.75 | 454 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | 267.65 | 75.9 | 191.75 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 18.3 | 45.45 | 27.15 | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 8.3 | 26.9 | 18.6 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 19.5 | 10.17 | 9.33 | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Côte d'Ivoire or Myanmar?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 12 against 7 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar?
- 5, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2025.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Myanmar rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 32nd and Myanmar ranks 35th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.