Brazil vs Sao Tome and Principe: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Brazil
0
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
0
in 2021
Brazil rank
65th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 against 0 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Brazil ranks 65th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 480 | 3.22 | 476.78 | Brazil |
| 1990s | 162.8 | 1.2 | 161.6 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 14.3 | 0 | 14.3 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.9 | 0 | 1.9 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Brazil or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Brazil, at 0 against 0 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 65th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.