Bolivia vs Macao: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Bolivia
0
in 2025
Macao
0
in 2025
Bolivia rank
65th
Macao rank
65th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Bolivia
- Macao
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0 against 0 in Macao, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 65th and Macao ranks 65th of 210 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 110 | 0 | 110 | Bolivia |
| 1990s | 24.2 | 0.1 | 24.1 | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 2.3 | 0 | 2.3 | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Bolivia or Macao?
- Bolivia, at 0 against 0 in Macao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Bolivia and Macao?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Macao?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Macao rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Bolivia ranks 65th and Macao ranks 65th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.