Bangladesh vs Sierra Leone: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Bangladesh
35
in 2025
Sierra Leone
38
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
18th
Sierra Leone rank
16th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Bangladesh
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 38 against 35 in Bangladesh, a difference of 3.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 18th and Sierra Leone ranks 16th of 210 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1,149 | 360.67 | 788.17 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 705.6 | 34.1 | 671.5 | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 336.2 | 43.5 | 292.7 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 99.95 | 20.2 | 79.75 | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 33.83 | 11.17 | 22.67 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Bangladesh or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 38 against 35 in Bangladesh as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Bangladesh and Sierra Leone?
- 3, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sierra Leone?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Sierra Leone rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Bangladesh ranks 18th and Sierra Leone ranks 16th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.