Bangladesh vs Indonesia: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Bangladesh
35
in 2025
Indonesia
50
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
18th
Indonesia rank
15th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Bangladesh
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 50 against 35 in Bangladesh, a difference of 15.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 18th and Indonesia ranks 15th of 210 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1,141 | 914.3 | 226.45 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | 705.6 | 641.6 | 64 | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 336.2 | 173.1 | 163.1 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 99.95 | 67.9 | 32.05 | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 33.83 | 26 | 7.83 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Bangladesh or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 50 against 35 in Bangladesh as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Bangladesh and Indonesia?
- 15, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Indonesia?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Indonesia rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Bangladesh ranks 18th and Indonesia ranks 15th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.