Angola vs Philippines: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Angola
79
in 2025
Philippines
89
in 2025
Angola rank
12th
Philippines rank
10th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Angola
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 89 against 79 in Angola, a difference of 10.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Philippines ahead.
Angola ranks 12th and Philippines ranks 10th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 619 | 2,874 | 2,255 | Philippines |
| 1980s | 698.2 | 1,073 | 374.9 | Philippines |
| 1990s | 423 | 297.4 | 125.6 | Angola |
| 2000s | 120.6 | 197.9 | 77.3 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 43.4 | 96.3 | 52.9 | Philippines |
| 2020s | 196.33 | 74.67 | 121.67 | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Angola or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 89 against 79 in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Angola and Philippines?
- 10, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Philippines?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Philippines rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Angola ranks 12th and Philippines ranks 10th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.