Afghanistan vs Malaysia: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
Afghanistan
19
in 2025
Malaysia
18
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
23rd
Malaysia rank
24th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- Afghanistan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 19 against 18 in Malaysia, a difference of 1.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malaysia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 23rd and Malaysia ranks 24th of 210 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 50.33 | 48.33 | 2 | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 100.25 | 11.75 | 88.5 | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 128.85 | 10.3 | 118.55 | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 21.15 | 13 | 8.15 | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 536.17 | 14.83 | 521.33 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, Afghanistan or Malaysia?
- Afghanistan, at 19 against 18 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between Afghanistan and Malaysia?
- 1, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Malaysia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and Malaysia rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- Afghanistan ranks 23rd and Malaysia ranks 24th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases with 616 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.