Libya vs Serbia: Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate
Libya
-100 % change on previous year
in 1993
Serbia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2010
Libya rank
56th
Serbia rank
56th
Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate over time
- Libya
- Serbia
How they compare
Libya currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Serbia ahead.
Libya ranks 56th and Serbia ranks 56th of 116 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | -40.56 % change on previous year | -28.89 % change on previous year | 11.67 % change on previous year | Serbia |
| 1990s | -61.9 % change on previous year | -62.96 % change on previous year | 1.06 % change on previous year | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate, Libya or Serbia?
- Libya, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 1993.
- What is the difference in neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate between Libya and Serbia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 1993.
- How do Libya and Serbia rank globally for neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate?
- Libya ranks 56th and Serbia ranks 56th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.