East Asia and Pacific vs Guinea-Bissau: Neonatal mortality rate - UN IGME estimates
East Asia and Pacific
6.67
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
31.98
in 2024
East Asia and Pacific rank
7th
Guinea-Bissau rank
9th
Neonatal mortality rate - UN IGME estimates over time
- East Asia and Pacific
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 31.98 against 6.67 in East Asia and Pacific, a difference of 25.31.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 4.8 times East Asia and Pacific's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
East Asia and Pacific ranks 7th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 9th of 11 groups.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia and Pacific | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.42 | 60.6 | 36.19 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 15.45 | 51.15 | 35.7 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 8.63 | 39.94 | 31.31 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 7 | 33.44 | 26.44 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - un igme estimates, East Asia and Pacific or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 31.98 against 6.67 in East Asia and Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - un igme estimates between East Asia and Pacific and Guinea-Bissau?
- 25.31, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia and Pacific and Guinea-Bissau?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do East Asia and Pacific and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - un igme estimates?
- East Asia and Pacific ranks 7th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 9th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - UN IGME estimates (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.