Sub-Saharan Africa vs Zimbabwe: Neonatal mortality rate - Remains constant
Sub-Saharan Africa
26.54
in 2030
Zimbabwe
33.68
in 2030
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd
Zimbabwe rank
5th
Neonatal mortality rate - Remains constant over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 33.68 against 26.54 in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 7.14.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 11 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 26.55 | 33.68 | 7.13 | Zimbabwe |
| 2030s | 26.54 | 33.68 | 7.14 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - remains constant, Sub-Saharan Africa or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 33.68 against 26.54 in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - remains constant between Sub-Saharan Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 7.14, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - remains constant?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - Remains constant (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.