Low income (World Bank) vs Zimbabwe: Neonatal mortality rate
Low income (World Bank)
24.94
in 2024
Zimbabwe
33.68
in 2024
Low income (World Bank) rank
2nd
Zimbabwe rank
5th
Neonatal mortality rate over time
- Low income (World Bank)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 33.68 against 24.94 in Low income (World Bank), a difference of 8.74.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Low income (World Bank)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Low income (World Bank) ahead.
Low income (World Bank) ranks 2nd and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 11 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Low income (World Bank) averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income (World Bank) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 43.13 | 20.57 | 22.57 | Low income (World Bank) |
| 2000s | 34.84 | 25.36 | 9.48 | Low income (World Bank) |
| 2010s | 28.33 | 27.97 | 0.366 | Low income (World Bank) |
| 2020s | 25.7 | 32.77 | 7.07 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate, Low income (World Bank) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 33.68 against 24.94 in Low income (World Bank) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate between Low income (World Bank) and Zimbabwe?
- 8.74, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income (World Bank) and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Low income (World Bank) and Zimbabwe rank globally for neonatal mortality rate?
- Low income (World Bank) ranks 2nd and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Neonatal mortality rate (per 1000 live births). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.