Sub-Saharan Africa vs Zimbabwe: Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched
Sub-Saharan Africa
2.8
in 2030
Zimbabwe
2.8
in 2030
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
1st
Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 2.8 against 2.8 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 11 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 9.81 | 11.46 | 1.65 | Zimbabwe |
| 2030s | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched, Sub-Saharan Africa or Zimbabwe?
- Sub-Saharan Africa, at 2.8 against 2.8 in Zimbabwe as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched between Sub-Saharan Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.