Equatorial Guinea vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched
Equatorial Guinea
2.8
in 2030
Sub-Saharan Africa
2.8
in 2030
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st
Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2.8 against 2.8 in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 200 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 9.82 | 9.81 | 0.0076 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2030s | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched, Equatorial Guinea or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 2.8 against 2.8 in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched between Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.