Eastern and Southern Africa vs Guinea-Bissau: Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched
Eastern and Southern Africa
2.8
in 2030
Guinea-Bissau
2.8
in 2030
Eastern and Southern Africa rank
1st
Guinea-Bissau rank
1st
Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched over time
- Eastern and Southern Africa
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Eastern and Southern Africa currently reports 2.8 against 2.8 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 1st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 1st of 11 groups.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern and Southern Africa | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 8.94 | 11.1 | 2.15 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2030s | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched, Eastern and Southern Africa or Guinea-Bissau?
- Eastern and Southern Africa, at 2.8 against 2.8 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched between Eastern and Southern Africa and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with Eastern and Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern and Southern Africa and Guinea-Bissau?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do Eastern and Southern Africa and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched?
- Eastern and Southern Africa ranks 1st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 1st of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.