British Virgin Islands vs South Sudan: Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched
British Virgin Islands
2.8
in 2030
South Sudan
2.8
in 2030
British Virgin Islands rank
1st
South Sudan rank
1st
Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched over time
- British Virgin Islands
- South Sudan
How they compare
British Virgin Islands currently reports 2.8 against 2.8 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
British Virgin Islands ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 200 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | British Virgin Islands | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 4.33 | 12.67 | 8.34 | South Sudan |
| 2030s | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched, British Virgin Islands or South Sudan?
- British Virgin Islands, at 2.8 against 2.8 in South Sudan as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched between British Virgin Islands and South Sudan?
- 0, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do British Virgin Islands and South Sudan rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched?
- British Virgin Islands ranks 1st and South Sudan ranks 1st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.