Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sri Lanka: Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.8
in 2030
Sri Lanka
2.8
in 2030
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2.8 against 2.8 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 200 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 3.54 | 3.34 | 0.1954 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2030s | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sri Lanka?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2.8 against 2.8 in Sri Lanka as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sri Lanka rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.