Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.8
in 2030
Equatorial Guinea
2.8
in 2030
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2.8 against 2.8 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 200 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 3.54 | 9.82 | 6.29 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2030s | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Equatorial Guinea?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2.8 against 2.8 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - high-income country average rate matched?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - High-income country average rate matched (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.