East Asia and Pacific vs Guinea-Bissau: Neonatal mortality rate - Current trends maintained
East Asia and Pacific
5.53
in 2030
Guinea-Bissau
27.97
in 2030
East Asia and Pacific rank
7th
Guinea-Bissau rank
10th
Neonatal mortality rate - Current trends maintained over time
- East Asia and Pacific
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 27.97 against 5.53 in East Asia and Pacific, a difference of 22.44.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 5.1 times East Asia and Pacific's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
East Asia and Pacific ranks 7th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 10th of 11 groups.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia and Pacific | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 6.07 | 29.92 | 23.86 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2030s | 5.53 | 27.97 | 22.44 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal mortality rate - current trends maintained, East Asia and Pacific or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 27.97 against 5.53 in East Asia and Pacific as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal mortality rate - current trends maintained between East Asia and Pacific and Guinea-Bissau?
- 22.44, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia and Pacific and Guinea-Bissau?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do East Asia and Pacific and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for neonatal mortality rate - current trends maintained?
- East Asia and Pacific ranks 7th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 10th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal mortality rate - Current trends maintained (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.