Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Suriname: Neonatal deaths - UN IGME estimates
Bosnia and Herzegovina
108
in 2024
Suriname
105
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
150th
Suriname rank
151st
Neonatal deaths - UN IGME estimates over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Suriname
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 108 against 105 in Suriname, a difference of 3.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 150th and Suriname ranks 151st of 200 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 507.6 | 218.4 | 289.2 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 221.6 | 193 | 28.6 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 148.9 | 147 | 1.9 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 117.2 | 112.4 | 4.8 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal deaths - un igme estimates, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Suriname?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 108 against 105 in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in neonatal deaths - un igme estimates between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
- 3, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Suriname rank globally for neonatal deaths - un igme estimates?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 150th and Suriname ranks 151st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal deaths - UN IGME estimates (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.