Rwanda vs South Sudan: Neonatal deaths - SDG target met
Rwanda
5,079
in 2030
South Sudan
4,742
in 2030
Rwanda rank
47th
South Sudan rank
48th
Neonatal deaths - SDG target met over time
- Rwanda
- South Sudan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 5,079 against 4,742 in South Sudan, a difference of 337.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2025 it was South Sudan ahead.
Rwanda ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 48th of 200 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 5,974 | 8,379 | 2,405 | South Sudan |
| 2030s | 5,079 | 4,742 | 337 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher neonatal deaths - sdg target met, Rwanda or South Sudan?
- Rwanda, at 5,079 against 4,742 in South Sudan as of 2030.
- What is the difference in neonatal deaths - sdg target met between Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 337, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2030.
- How do Rwanda and South Sudan rank globally for neonatal deaths - sdg target met?
- Rwanda ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 48th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as Neonatal deaths - SDG target met (projection). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.