Early-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100,000)

Early-demographic dividend
0.3584 per 100,000 population
in 2021
Sudan
1.16 per 100,000 population
in 2021
Early-demographic dividend rank
40th
Sudan rank
43rd

Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100,000) over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Sudan
0.511.52200020102021

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 1.16 per 100,000 population against 0.3584 per 100,000 population in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.8016 per 100,000 population.

That makes Sudan's figure about 3.2 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 40th and Sudan ranks 43rd of 47 groups.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4882 per 100,000 population 1.63 per 100,000 population 1.14 per 100,000 population Sudan
2010s 0.4232 per 100,000 population 1.49 per 100,000 population 1.07 per 100,000 population Sudan
2020s 0.3629 per 100,000 population 1.21 per 100,000 population 0.8521 per 100,000 population Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, Early-demographic dividend or Sudan?
Sudan, at 1.16 per 100,000 population against 0.3584 per 100,000 population in Early-demographic dividend as of 2021.
What is the difference in mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning between Early-demographic dividend and Sudan?
0.8016 per 100,000 population, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Sudan?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Sudan rank globally for mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 40th and Sudan ranks 43rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository (http://apps.who.int/ghodata/)., World Health Organization (WHO), published as Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100,000 population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository (http://apps.who.int/ghodata/)., World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-rate-attributed-to-unintentional-poisoning-per-100-000-population/early-demographic-dividend/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-rate-attributed-to-unintentional-poisoning-per-100-000-population/early-demographic-dividend/sudan/">Early-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100,000 population)
Unit
per 100,000 population
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository (http://apps.who.int/ghodata/)., World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
232 places, 5,104 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisonings is the number of deaths from unintentional poisonings in a year per 100,000 population. Unintentional poisoning can be caused by household chemicals, pesticides, kerosene, carbon monoxide and medicines, or can be the result of environmental contamination or occupational chemical exposure.