Australia vs Brazil: Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female

Australia
0.074 per 100,000 female population
in 2021
Brazil
0.08 per 100,000 female population
in 2021
Australia rank
157th
Brazil rank
154th

Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female over time

  • Australia
  • Brazil
0.050.10.150.20.25200020102021

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.08 per 100,000 female population against 0.074 per 100,000 female population in Australia, a difference of 0.006 per 100,000 female population.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 157th and Brazil ranks 154th of 185 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Brazil in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Brazil Difference Ahead
2000s 0.179 per 100,000 female population 0.0574 per 100,000 female population 0.1216 per 100,000 female population Australia
2010s 0.143 per 100,000 female population 0.0807 per 100,000 female population 0.0623 per 100,000 female population Australia
2020s 0.0825 per 100,000 female population 0.1 per 100,000 female population 0.0175 per 100,000 female population Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female, Australia or Brazil?
Brazil, at 0.08 per 100,000 female population against 0.074 per 100,000 female population in Australia as of 2021.
What is the difference in mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female between Australia and Brazil?
0.006 per 100,000 female population, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brazil?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Australia and Brazil rank globally for mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female?
Australia ranks 157th and Brazil ranks 154th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository (http://apps.who.int/ghodata/)., World Health Organization (WHO), published as Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female (per 100,000 female population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Brazil: Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository (http://apps.who.int/ghodata/)., World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-rate-attributed-to-unintentional-poisoning-female-per-100-000-female-population/australia/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-rate-attributed-to-unintentional-poisoning-female-per-100-000-female-population/australia/brazil/">Australia vs Brazil: Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female (per 100,000 female population)
Unit
per 100,000 female population
Source
World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository (http://apps.who.int/ghodata/)., World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
232 places, 5,104 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisonings is the number of female deaths from unintentional poisonings in a year per 100,000 female population. Unintentional poisoning can be caused by household chemicals, pesticides, kerosene, carbon monoxide and medicines, or can be the result of environmental contamination or occupational chemical exposure.