Congo vs Philippines: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to

Congo
12.3 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2019
Philippines
13.38 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2019
Congo rank
52nd
Philippines rank
51st

Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to over time

  • Congo
  • Philippines
102030405060199020042019

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 13.38 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 12.3 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Congo, a difference of 1.08 Per 1 000 inhabitants.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 51st of 177 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 52.21 Per 1 000 inhabitants 21.94 Per 1 000 inhabitants 30.27 Per 1 000 inhabitants Congo
2000s 35.68 Per 1 000 inhabitants 19.28 Per 1 000 inhabitants 16.4 Per 1 000 inhabitants Congo
2010s 18.24 Per 1 000 inhabitants 16.94 Per 1 000 inhabitants 1.3 Per 1 000 inhabitants Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to, Congo or Philippines?
Philippines, at 13.38 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 12.3 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to between Congo and Philippines?
1.08 Per 1 000 inhabitants, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Philippines?
30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
How do Congo and Philippines rank globally for mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to?
Congo ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 51st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to environment-related risks — Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Philippines: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-morbidity-and-welfare-cost-from-exposure-to-environment-related-risks/congo-rep/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-morbidity-and-welfare-cost-from-exposure-to-environment-related-risks/congo-rep/philippines/">Congo vs Philippines: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to environment-related risks — Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)
Unit
Per 1 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
212 places, 6,360 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed

The Mortality and Welfare Costs from Exposure to Environmental Risks database provides data on health impacts and welfare costs from exposure to environmentally-related risks. This dataset integrates data on mortality and Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019), and quantifies welfare costs using a methodology adapted from the OECD (2017), The Rising Cost of Ambient Air Pollution thus far in the 21st Century: Results from the BRIICS and the OECD Countries. The database covers a wide range of environmental risks, including air pollution, climate-related threats, exposure to hazardous substances such as lead and radon, unsafe water and sanitation, environment-related occupational risks, and environment-related behavioral risks. The data are disaggregated by gender and age groups, providing a granular view of how these risks impact dimensions of the population. Data source(s): GBD (2019), Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Results, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, United States. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool GBD 2019 Risk Factor Collaborators (2020), Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, The Lancet, Volume 396, Issue 10258, Pages 1223-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2. Online Appendix 1: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0140673620307522-mmc1.pdf OECD (2017), The Rising Cost of Ambient Air Pollution thus far in the 21st Century: Results from the BRIICS and the OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/d1b2b844-en Contact: env.stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: December 2020 For further details on the dataset, consult the Dataset documentation.