Botswana vs Namibia: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to

Botswana
10.95 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2019
Namibia
11.16 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2019
Botswana rank
55th
Namibia rank
54th

Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
10203040199020042019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 11.16 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 10.95 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Botswana, a difference of 0.21 Per 1 000 inhabitants.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 54th of 177 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 33.16 Per 1 000 inhabitants 36.14 Per 1 000 inhabitants 2.98 Per 1 000 inhabitants Namibia
2000s 23.41 Per 1 000 inhabitants 26.37 Per 1 000 inhabitants 2.95 Per 1 000 inhabitants Namibia
2010s 13.83 Per 1 000 inhabitants 15.14 Per 1 000 inhabitants 1.31 Per 1 000 inhabitants Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to, Botswana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 11.16 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 10.95 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to between Botswana and Namibia?
0.21 Per 1 000 inhabitants, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to?
Botswana ranks 55th and Namibia ranks 54th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to environment-related risks — Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Namibia: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-morbidity-and-welfare-cost-from-exposure-to-environment-related-risks/botswana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-morbidity-and-welfare-cost-from-exposure-to-environment-related-risks/botswana/namibia/">Botswana vs Namibia: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to environment-related risks — Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)
Unit
Per 1 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
212 places, 6,360 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed

The Mortality and Welfare Costs from Exposure to Environmental Risks database provides data on health impacts and welfare costs from exposure to environmentally-related risks. This dataset integrates data on mortality and Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019), and quantifies welfare costs using a methodology adapted from the OECD (2017), The Rising Cost of Ambient Air Pollution thus far in the 21st Century: Results from the BRIICS and the OECD Countries. The database covers a wide range of environmental risks, including air pollution, climate-related threats, exposure to hazardous substances such as lead and radon, unsafe water and sanitation, environment-related occupational risks, and environment-related behavioral risks. The data are disaggregated by gender and age groups, providing a granular view of how these risks impact dimensions of the population. Data source(s): GBD (2019), Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Results, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, United States. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool GBD 2019 Risk Factor Collaborators (2020), Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, The Lancet, Volume 396, Issue 10258, Pages 1223-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2. Online Appendix 1: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0140673620307522-mmc1.pdf OECD (2017), The Rising Cost of Ambient Air Pollution thus far in the 21st Century: Results from the BRIICS and the OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/d1b2b844-en Contact: env.stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: December 2020 For further details on the dataset, consult the Dataset documentation.