Bhutan vs Congo: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to

Bhutan
13.87 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2019
Congo
12.3 Per 1 000 inhabitants
in 2019
Bhutan rank
50th
Congo rank
52nd

Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to over time

  • Bhutan
  • Congo
20406080199020042019

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 13.87 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 12.3 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Congo, a difference of 1.57 Per 1 000 inhabitants.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 50th and Congo ranks 52nd of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 70.34 Per 1 000 inhabitants 52.21 Per 1 000 inhabitants 18.13 Per 1 000 inhabitants Bhutan
2000s 36.46 Per 1 000 inhabitants 35.68 Per 1 000 inhabitants 0.7753 Per 1 000 inhabitants Bhutan
2010s 17.48 Per 1 000 inhabitants 18.24 Per 1 000 inhabitants 0.7574 Per 1 000 inhabitants Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to, Bhutan or Congo?
Bhutan, at 13.87 Per 1 000 inhabitants against 12.3 Per 1 000 inhabitants in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to between Bhutan and Congo?
1.57 Per 1 000 inhabitants, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Congo?
30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Congo rank globally for mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to?
Bhutan ranks 50th and Congo ranks 52nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to environment-related risks — Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Congo: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-morbidity-and-welfare-cost-from-exposure-to-environment-related-risks/bhutan/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/mortality-morbidity-and-welfare-cost-from-exposure-to-environment-related-risks/bhutan/congo-rep/">Bhutan vs Congo: Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mortality, morbidity and welfare cost from exposure to environment-related risks — Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)
Unit
Per 1 000 inhabitants
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
212 places, 6,360 data points, 1990–2019
Last refreshed

The Mortality and Welfare Costs from Exposure to Environmental Risks database provides data on health impacts and welfare costs from exposure to environmentally-related risks. This dataset integrates data on mortality and Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019), and quantifies welfare costs using a methodology adapted from the OECD (2017), The Rising Cost of Ambient Air Pollution thus far in the 21st Century: Results from the BRIICS and the OECD Countries. The database covers a wide range of environmental risks, including air pollution, climate-related threats, exposure to hazardous substances such as lead and radon, unsafe water and sanitation, environment-related occupational risks, and environment-related behavioral risks. The data are disaggregated by gender and age groups, providing a granular view of how these risks impact dimensions of the population. Data source(s): GBD (2019), Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Results, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, United States. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool GBD 2019 Risk Factor Collaborators (2020), Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, The Lancet, Volume 396, Issue 10258, Pages 1223-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2. Online Appendix 1: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0140673620307522-mmc1.pdf OECD (2017), The Rising Cost of Ambient Air Pollution thus far in the 21st Century: Results from the BRIICS and the OECD Countries, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/d1b2b844-en Contact: env.stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: December 2020 For further details on the dataset, consult the Dataset documentation.