Namibia vs Romania: Measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) immunization coverage
Namibia
67.0%
in 2025
Romania
68.0%
in 2025
Namibia rank
142nd
Romania rank
139th
Measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) immunization coverage over time
- Namibia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 68.0% against 67.0% in Namibia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Romania ahead.
Namibia ranks 142nd and Romania ranks 139th of 192 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 96.0% | 96.0% | Romania |
| 2010s | 13.8% | 83.4% | 69.6% | Romania |
| 2020s | 65.5% | 69.8% | 4.3% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (mcv2) immunization coverage, Namibia or Romania?
- Romania, at 68.0% against 67.0% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (mcv2) immunization coverage between Namibia and Romania?
- 1.0%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Romania rank globally for measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (mcv2) immunization coverage?
- Namibia ranks 142nd and Romania ranks 139th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) immunization coverage by the locally recommended age (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.