Malta vs WPR: Mean total cholesterol, crude
Malta
5.2
in 2018
WPR
4.7
in 2018
Malta rank
3rd
WPR rank
3rd
Mean total cholesterol, crude over time
- Malta
- WPR
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.2 against 4.7 in WPR, a difference of 0.5.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times WPR's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 3rd and WPR ranks 3rd of 190 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | WPR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.96 | 4.27 | 1.69 | Malta |
| 1990s | 5.7 | 4.41 | 1.29 | Malta |
| 2000s | 5.45 | 4.55 | 0.9 | Malta |
| 2010s | 5.28 | 4.67 | 0.6111 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, crude, Malta or WPR?
- Malta, at 5.2 against 4.7 in WPR as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, crude between Malta and WPR?
- 0.5, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and WPR?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Malta and WPR rank globally for mean total cholesterol, crude?
- Malta ranks 3rd and WPR ranks 3rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.