Libya vs Nauru: Mean total cholesterol, crude
Libya
4.3
in 2018
Nauru
4.3
in 2018
Libya rank
123rd
Nauru rank
123rd
Mean total cholesterol, crude over time
- Libya
- Nauru
How they compare
Libya currently reports 4.3 against 4.3 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 123rd and Nauru ranks 123rd of 190 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.54 | 4.92 | 0.38 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 4.6 | 4.99 | 0.39 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 4.49 | 4.78 | 0.29 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 4.37 | 4.44 | 0.0778 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, crude, Libya or Nauru?
- Libya, at 4.3 against 4.3 in Nauru as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, crude between Libya and Nauru?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nauru?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Libya and Nauru rank globally for mean total cholesterol, crude?
- Libya ranks 123rd and Nauru ranks 123rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.