Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Costa Rica: Mean total cholesterol, crude
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.8
in 2018
Costa Rica
4.8
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
47th
Costa Rica rank
47th
Mean total cholesterol, crude over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 4.8 against 4.8 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Costa Rica ranks 47th of 190 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5.04 | 4.65 | 0.39 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 5.1 | 4.82 | 0.28 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 4.98 | 4.9 | 0.08 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 4.83 | 4.86 | 0.0222 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, crude, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Costa Rica?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 4.8 against 4.8 in Costa Rica as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, crude between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica rank globally for mean total cholesterol, crude?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Costa Rica ranks 47th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.