AMR vs Malta: Mean total cholesterol, crude
AMR
4.7
in 2018
Malta
5.2
in 2018
AMR rank
3rd
Malta rank
3rd
Mean total cholesterol, crude over time
- AMR
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.2 against 4.7 in AMR, a difference of 0.5.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times AMR's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 3rd of 11 groups.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 5 | 5.96 | 0.96 | Malta |
| 1990s | 4.91 | 5.7 | 0.79 | Malta |
| 2000s | 4.84 | 5.45 | 0.61 | Malta |
| 2010s | 4.74 | 5.28 | 0.5333 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean total cholesterol, crude, AMR or Malta?
- Malta, at 5.2 against 4.7 in AMR as of 2018.
- What is the difference in mean total cholesterol, crude between AMR and Malta?
- 0.5, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Malta?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do AMR and Malta rank globally for mean total cholesterol, crude?
- AMR ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 3rd of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean total cholesterol, crude. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.